Californians for Electoral Reform |
PO Box 128, Sacramento, CA 95812 916 455-8021 |
|
Home | About CfER | Join / renew | Calendar | Search |
---|
Voice
for Democracy Newsletter
of Californians for Electoral Reform Summer 2005 |
Chapter
Roundtable
Our
chapter roundtable this summer provides a whirlwind tour of the state,
from Humboldt County in the north to San Diego, with stops along the way
in Mendocino, Alameda, El Dorado, Fresno, and Los Angeles.
Before we depart, however, we must give brief notice of two
statewide developments. CfER’s
new website is coming soon. Check
in at https://www.cfer.org
frequently. In fact, the
transformation of our Internet presence may have already happened by the
time you read this. Developed by
Rob Dickinson, the new site will encourage frequent additions and updates,
have more visual appeal, and eventually include a members-only section. On
June 11, CfER and FairVote (http://www.fairvote.org)
co-sponsored seven Houseparties for Democracy in San Rafael,
Oakland, Redwood City, Mountain View, Ventura, Cambria, and Riverside.
State Senator and SB 596 sponsor Debra Bowen (D-28) and
FairVote’s executive director Rob Richie spoke via a teleconferencing
hookup. Now
for the tour. Near the top of the
state, in Humboldt County, CfER member Scott Menzies is one of two
activists who planned and conducted a town hall event on April 24 to
promote instant runoff voting in Eureka. For
more information see http://tinyurl.com/8txt8. In
Mendocino County, Ukiah City Council member Mari Rodin introduced a
resolution endorsing SB 596 on May 18. Chris
Jerdonek helped draft the resolution and Bob Richard made a presentation
to the city council--both with support from Mendocino CfER member Tom
Wodetzki. The resolution didn’t
pass, but the council discussion resulted in local press coverage that was
very positive about ranked voting (see http://tinyurl.com/76gqb). IRV
activists in Alameda County are busier than ever.
On May 12, voting equipment vendor Diebold submitted a lengthy
report to county officials purporting to explain why it would take so long
and cost so
much
to develop IRV software for their equipment. Under
pressure from both citizens and Berkeley city officials, a meeting of IRV
activists and both city and county officials was held on June 15.
The county Registrar formed three working groups, including both
officials and citizens, to study three aspects of implementation:
technical, legal and political. CfER
activists including Steve Chessin, Dave Heller and Dave Kadlecek, are on all
three committees. The
city of Oakland has started thinking about its charter provision allowing
for IRV in special elections. During
a spring campaign to fill a vacancy on the city council, the top eight
(out of nine) candidates endorsed IRV. A
June 23 meeting of the city council’s Rules and Legislation Committee
heard a report on implementation from the city clerk, along with input
from Dave Kadlecek and other activists. On
May 17, the same committee of the San Leandro city council discussed IRV.
San Leandro’s charter language allows, but does not require, IRV
for all elections. The
Fall issue of Voice for Democracy will include a full report
on Alameda County. Meanwhile, visit
http://oakprefvote.home.igc.org
for Alameda County news. Watch
for display ads appearing soon in weekly papers in Alameda County as part
of CfER’s new advertising campaign.
In
El Dorado County, Paula Lee is on a citizen’s advisory panel
helping the registrar of voters evaluate proposals from voting machine
vendors. She has been working hard
in that role to insure compatibility with ranked voting.
The League of Women Voters is planning an IRV campaign once
equipment is in place. From
Fresno County, Ryan Dunning reports that Clovis, currently a
general law city of about 70,000, plans to consider adopting a charter.
CfER activists in the area will make sure that ranked voting is
part of the discussion. Santa
Monica Ranked Voting
(http://www.smrankedvoting.com)
now has the public support of two city council members for adoption of
choice voting in city council elections. On
June 7, Amy Connolly asked the city council to put the subject on its
agenda so that the group may make an appeal to the council to instruct
city staff to study the feasibility of adopting and implementing choice
voting in Santa Monica, including whether an amendment to the city’s
charter would be required. The
presentation will most likely happen in mid-September. Along
with Alameda County, Santa Monica will part of CfER’s new advertising
campaign. Finally,
in San Diego, Edward Teyssier is talking about IRV with staff in
the office of Councilmember and mayoral candidate Donna Frye, who wants
the city council to consider the subject. At
least one of Frye’s opponents in the first round of the special mayoral
election, Richard Ryder, is also an IRV advocate, as is City Attorney Mike
Aguirre. Compiled
by Bob Richard |
To join CfER, or renew your membership, please visit |